|
|
|
Welcome To Unbound Zine |
|
| Album Review |
|
The CafFiends-Fission, Fusion and Things made of Concrete
(Indianola, 2003)
This one is pretty all over the place. The bands main sound is a raucous approach to hardcore, but you’ll hear little jazz interludes and a few instrumentals along the way. They also use a lot of clean guitar riffs which do a lot to break up the overall chaotic approach of the band.
I’m almost reminded of Refused here. Musically, I don’t hear all that much. But the overall approach to the album and the layout reminds me of The Future of Punk to Come. I think that Refused wasn’t afraid to do whatever they wanted with that album and the same can be said for The CafFiends with this album. They aren’t afraid to explore outside of the typical parameters of hardcore music, and while it could fail miserably, it actually works for them.
The main core of the bands sound is dissonant fast paced hardcore. It’s along the lines of bands like Converge or possibly Curl Up and Die, but I’d say they let the music breath a lot more. It’s not all about noise, there is actually some substance to the riffing even when it’s dissonant. They don’t just rely on the usually ways to make things noisy. ie. sloppy playing and a shitty production. When they stray from the main path they definitely stray. There are songs that are completely clean in terms of both vocals and guitars. Like I mentioned earlier there are a few jazz interludes as well. I think the most surprising interludes are the noise interludes. I’ve never really been into the style myself, so I could have lived without them. It’s definitely an original idea for a hardcore album though.
The production is simple and to the point, yet still sounds tight and allows every aspect of the bands sound to come across. The guitars are heavy as they need to be, yet still have a lot of clarity. Even with the noisy approach it’s easy to hear everything that is going on. I’m a huge fan of the drum production. It just has a clean and natural tone that a lot of bands would kill for. In a time so cluttered with triggered drums, this is a nice change of pace.
This is a band that is almost impossible to pigeonhole, and that could work for or against them I’d say. If you aren’t in experimenting you probably will get into the more straight forward tracks, and not the others. If you don’t like your hardcore safe and are into experimentation however, this is an album you’ll want to pick up ASAP.
|
|
|

UN: Fission, Fusion and things Made of Concrete was initially released
by the bands themselves. How did the re-release on Indianola come about?
Was it just a matter of them hearing the album and needing the bring it
to more peoples attention?
Chris: It was really unexpected, but a friend of the guys at Indianola
just popped up on our message board one day and said "we should talk." I
think he just heard a few songs off MP3.com and really liked it. We
never really intended to put the album out on a label, but they were
such great people and really loved the record, so they put it out. So
basically, they heard the stuff and needed to get it to more people's
attention.
UN: Was this album initially supposed to be the final recording for the
band? It said it the bio that this was once looked upon as the final
farewell for the band. Did possibly the more experimental approach
rejuvenate everyone into keeping the band together?
Chris: Yes, this was supposed to be the final recording for the band,
and will definitely be the final recording released under the CafFiends
name. I would have to agree that the experimental tracks do really make
us want to make more music and in the same vein as some of those tracks.
UN: What would you attribute the bands new found sense of
experimentalism to? From what I could gather the bands previous releases
were a bit more straight forward, and you guys went all out with a
diverse approach this time around.
Chris: It really had a lot to do with the styles of music that we were
listening too and the fact that we didn't really care about impressing
hardcore kids anymore.
Jon: I wouldn't say that our sense of experimentation is anything new.
I've always considered us an experimental band 'cause we've always tried
to push ourselves. We just decided with this album to totally cross the
line and try and be more than just a progressive hardcore band.
UN: The album name was inspired by the book The Blinding Curve of
Energy. Was exactly about the band inspired the name of the album? I
have to tell you I had no idea what to think of the title when I first
read it. It definitely seemed to have some thought behind it, but where
exactly it came from I had no idea.
Jon: Actually, the book is called "The Curve of Binding Energy", by John
McPhee. Don't worry, it gets mixed up all the time. It always takes us
about six months to come up with an album title. We were kicking around
ideas like "Arroyo" or the 2001: A Space Odyssey inspired, "Monolith".
Then I remembered there already was a Kansas album titled Monolith. I
had been listening to a lot of experimental electronic music from the
sixties known as "Music Concrete", and the idea of the fixed concrete
sounds reminded me of the absolutes of life and how those are concrete
and never change. I was reading the John McPhee book, which is about
atomic energy, and I thought it would be great to juxtapose the
absolutes of life against the volatility of exploding atoms. So in
short, "Fission, Fusion and Things Made of Concrete" is about the
absolutes and variables of life.
UN: With a band that can basically do anything, do you still have to set
boundaries for the band? Like say for instance I couldn't really see the
band expanded into a hip-hop approach for a song. Do you think that to a
certain degree now that this album is released and people are exposed to
the new approach, that you can basically do anything?
Chris: What's funny is that Jon has produced some hip-hop records that
are nothing short of phenomenal. As far as this band is doing, we would
like to be diverse, but I also feel that excessive diversity doesn't
make sense sometimes. How can a band have a signature sound if they do
everything???
Jon: Yeah, Eddie and I produced this hip-hop album for our friend
"Dialogue" a couple of years ago. At that time we were listening a lot
of James Brown, and Motown stuff, and the album has this total funky
1973 feel cause it's all real drums and analog synthesizers and stuff
you would hear on a Herbie Hancock record. So in a way we've already
done hip-hop.
UN: Would you still say that the band is indeed a hardcore band? A lot
of the songs are still heavy hardcore, but you have certain songs that
really have nothing to do with hardcore at all. Do you think it's a
compliment when people say that you aren't just another hardcore band?
Originality, especially in hardcore, is hard to come by.
Chris: I love it when people recognize that even when we do play the
"hardcore" songs that we're trying to do something different. It's a
huge compliment.
Jon: We're more of a hardcore band live. We play with other hardcore
bands. When it comes to recording it's just us in the studio with no
outside influence. No producers, or label executives, or anyone to
impress. So we become truer to ourselves then we might be at "the big
mosh fest". Inside the studio we truly become our uninhibited selves and
we just make records.
UN: I would also say that you guys put a lot more time and thought into
the production then a lot of bands do these days. Was it a conscious
decision to use a analog production? Everything sounds incredibly
natural and that is not really common place these days. I was especially
impressed with the drum sound. I'm sick and tired of triggers and
anytime I hear a natural snare I definitely appreciate the production a
whole lot more.
Chris: We've always been huge fans of analog recording and vintage
equipment; it's not always the easiest thing to use and never the
cheapest way to go. Though the production is not perfect, I feel that
it's very distinctive.
Jon: There was a lot of analog signal path on this recording, simply
because 80% of the gear in my studio is old analog stuff. It just sounds
better to use analog gear to tweak tone than to have a computer crunch
numbers. The main console I have in my studio is a 32 input analog
console with transformers on all the inputs. I also used a Midas console
on most of the recording done outside of the studio, primarily the drums
on Twenty-Three. We didn't use any DSP or Pro Tools or anything like
that until we got to the mastering stage. We did however track most of
the songs on a digital tape recorder, but that was it. That's simply
because it's what I have and it's easier to roll around a DA-88 machine
than a Studer 800. I used an old Ampex AG440 reel to reel on the mixdown
of the album that really helped give the album a non digital tone. It's
not so much that we wanted a certain sound when recording this album,
but my audio ideologies, and the way I always do things in the studio.
UN: I'm not sure if I'm just imagining things but I definitely see a
common thread between this album and The Shape of Punk album by Refused.
Would you guys consider the band an influence at all? I think that was
one of the first hardcore albums to really break down walls and say fuck
the norm we like other styles and want to explore them.
Jon: Believe it or not, I think only one of us even owns that album. We
have all listened to it and I think we all like the Refused, but I think
we actually get more influence from say, The Beatles, than The Refused.
I think we were just in the same place in our musical lives where we
just wanted to make an album against the norm. I am flattered when
people compare us to bands like The Refused and Snapcase, and I guess we
do look up to them in a way, but we have never desired or tried to
emulate them.
UN: I'm curious to ask when you guys play live do you stick mainly to
the heavier material or is everything thrown in together? I'm not sure
how some of the stuff would work in terms of a loud, live setting.
Chris: We typically play just the heavy stuff live because it's simple,
but when we have a local show, we try to do at least one of the
experimental songs such as 23. We are actually planning on doing a show
soon where we play Fission Fusion and things made of Concrete in its
entirety.
UN: Is it safe to assume that all of you guys listen to a wide variety
of musical styles? It seems odd to me when people say they only listen
to one style of music. That would be like someone saying they only
experience one emotion. It just doesn't happen.
Chris: Yes, it is true.
Jon: I remember when I was sixteen, I had bleached hair, and patches on
all my clothing. I loved punk and skateing. I wondered how I was going
to change when I got older. Would I always wear chains, and skate with
my friends. Or was I going to sell out and become normal. Today, I'm
twenty-four I almost always wear a collared shirt and pants. I never
sold out or became normal, I just grew up. I think it's the same with
music. In your teen years you listen to what's cool and what your
friends listen to. As you grow your tastes expand, and you get to know
yourself more.
UN: Due to the bands love for analog recording would you guys like to
see a vinyl version of the album ever see the light of day? I think the
album would make an unbelievable double LP.
Chris: Doing a release on vinyl has always been a dream of this band. If
Indianola wants to do it, it's make me really happy.
Jon: What I really want to do is release a 5.1 mix on DTS or DVD-Audio,
or something like that. That way you could rock it in surround. We
recorded enough guitar tracks we could put a different amp in each
speaker.
UN: I'm curious to ask if you would say that you look at music as
something that you mainly do for yourself. If it wasn't, chances are
you'd think to much about what other people would want and the bands
sound would become diluted on the way. Fame or fortune doesn't seem to
be what you guys are after. What would you consider success? Making an
album you could look back on and say we made a piece of art, a unique
album that defies categorization.
Chris: I never expected to make money playing this style of music.
Success to me is being able to share your music with people who really
can understand and enjoy it.
Jon: When you make music that other people want to listen to and you
have a fan base, that's success. You have to keep your self in check and
realize why you got into music in the first place. It gets hard when you
get to the level where you have to make that choice of "Do I do this for
fun, or a living?" Cause you can't ride the fence. Either you work the
nine to five and rock out on the weekends, or you got to be totally
committed to turning your music into a commodity. I think every musician
dreams of being a star, but personally I am content playing in a coffee
house or dive club and just having fun and sharing with my friends.
|